A critical development has emerged in the growing SwissX criminal complaint saga: the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) in Antigua and Barbuda has formally responded, directing that the matter be escalated to the Commissioner of Police, Everton Jeffers.
Steadroy Benjamin is referenced in Robert Coram’s Caribbean Time Bomb, a powerful exposé that examines corruption, political power, and U.S. involvement in Antigua. His inclusion connects him to the book’s broader portrait of the figures and forces that shaped the country’s political landscape.
A rapidly escalating legal confrontation spanning Antigua, the United Kingdom, and the United States has entered a new phase, as a final non-political criminal complaint bundle has now been formally submitted to the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) in Antigua and Barbuda.
By Alki David
Attorney General Steadroy Benjamin’s Office Exposed In Evidence Bundle Forgery as Global Legal Crisis Deepens
Left – The forged document compared to authentic, registry-stamped claim form.
undersigned by Justice Rene Williams of Antigua & Barbuda High Court. He is also judging the Alpha Nero lawsuit.
Zachary Phillips Crown Counsel at Attorney General’s Chambers, Ministry of Legal Affairs accused of evidence tampering and perversion of justice
This follows the submission of a multi-layered evidentiary package alleging transnational obstruction of justice, evidence tampering, and coordinated legal interference across Antigua, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
The submission strengthens an already explosive dossier alleging evidence tampering, obstruction of justice, and coordinated cross-border legal interference tied to High Court proceedings and related international litigation.
New Filing: CID Criminal Conspiracy Complaint Bundle
The latest submission emphasizes a critical point—this is not political, but purely a matter of law:
- The filing explicitly states:
Above: Jan 16th Court hearing where Mr. Phillips delivered the forgeries. New filing builds directly on the previously submitted SwissX global criminal dossier. Alki David representing the SwissX Lawsuit.
Together, these documents form a coordinated evidentiary package now before law enforcement.
Allegations Expand: From Courtroom to Public Narrative
The latest bundle introduces a significant new dimension:
Public Defamation and Interference
According to the CID submission:
- A recorded broadcast allegedly claimed the legal proceedings were:
- “fabricated”
- a “fishing expedition”
- designed to “extort”
The complaint asserts these statements are:
- Demonstrably false
- Contradicted by court records
- Timed to coincide with active litigation constraints
This raises a new question for investigators:
Was public messaging used as part of a broader strategy to influence or undermine judicial proceedings?
Three Jurisdictions, One Pattern
Across all filings, a consistent pattern is alleged:
🇦🇬 Antigua (Criminal Anchor)
- High Court Claim ANUHCV2025/0149
- Alleged irregularities in filings and party records
- CID investigation now formally engaged
🇺🇸 United States (California Appeal)
- Appellate default risk under Rule 8.220
- Potential for decision based solely on appellant submissions
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
- Proceedings paused/adjourned
- Conduct of legal representatives under scrutiny
Core Allegations Remain Unchanged—but Strengthened
Across all documents, the central claims are consistent:
- Evidence Tampering
- Obstruction of Justice
- Abuse of Legal Process
- Cross-Border Coordination
- Narrative Manipulation via Media
The addition of the non-political bundle reframes the dispute as:
A rule-of-law issue, not a political dispute
Why the “Non-Political” Framing Matters
The explicit disclaimer in the CID filing is not incidental—it is strategic.
By removing political framing, the complaint:
- Forces authorities to treat the matter strictly as criminal and evidentiary
- Neutralizes potential defenses based on political interpretation
- Strengthens the case for international cooperation, including possible INTERPOL involvement
Mounting Pressure on Authorities
With:
- A formal CID complaint
- A comprehensive evidence dossier
- A non-political declaration
- Active proceedings in three jurisdictions
Authorities are now under increasing pressure to:
- Preserve evidence
- Open full criminal inquiries
- Coordinate across borders
Critical Timeline Ahead
Several key developments are approaching:
- April 1, 2026 (U.S.) — appellate default deadline
- Ongoing UK appellate positioning
- CID’s next steps in Antigua
Shockya Analysis
What began as a complex civil dispute has now evolved into something far larger:
A test case for whether legal systems across multiple countries can withstand coordinated pressure—legal, procedural, and narrative.
The addition of the non-political complaint bundle removes ambiguity:
This is no longer about perception.
It is about evidence, process, and accountability.
Final Word
The SwissX filings now present a unified argument:
- The courts have been engaged
- The evidence has been submitted
- Law enforcement has been notified
What remains is the response.
And that response may determine whether this case becomes:
- A contained dispute
—or—
- A landmark international investigation into the integrity of modern legal systems.