The debate over government weaponization took a sharp turn when “The View” co-host Whoopi Goldberg made headlines for her endorsement of former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) as a potential leader of the FBI or CIA. During a recent broadcast, Goldberg, alongside her fellow co-hosts, discussed Cheney’s involvement with Vice President Kamala Harris’ 2024 campaign, showcasing a unique alliance that has raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.
Cheney, known for her outspoken opposition to former President Donald Trump, has become a polarizing figure within the GOP. Her willingness to challenge Trump has earned her both staunch critics and unexpected allies. During the show, Goldberg lauded Cheney’s “moral core,” expressing her desire to see Cheney take the helm of a major intelligence agency under a potential Harris administration. “You could conceivably be a great AG,” Goldberg said. “I just feel like I would feel a lot better with you leading the FBI, the CIA, the NBC, the M&A, everybody.”
This statement has struck a nerve with conservatives who see Goldberg’s comments as emblematic of a broader push to reshape key institutions in ways that could further marginalize right-leaning perspectives. The idea of Cheney, a figure who has publicly taken on Trump and his supporters, heading an influential agency like the FBI or CIA is seen as a potential flashpoint in an already charged political atmosphere.
Critics argue that this kind of rhetoric highlights an increasing alignment between some establishment Republicans and figures on the left, especially under Harris’ campaign narrative. The speculation over what a Harris presidency could mean for conservatives has fueled conversations about government oversight, media bias, and the use of power in shaping national policy.
Goldberg’s remarks, though said with a hint of humor, carried significant weight, especially given Cheney’s recent positioning in the political landscape. For many on the right, the notion of an empowered Cheney leading a major federal institution is viewed as part of a larger issue: the perceived weaponization of government tools and resources against conservative viewpoints.
The implications of appointing someone like Cheney, known for taking hard stances that resonate more with centrist and left-leaning audiences, underscore the political realignment occurring within the U.S. The potential for such an appointment adds to the narrative that conservatives might face increased scrutiny or challenges should Harris secure victory in the upcoming election.
As discussions continue and the 2024 race heats up, Goldberg’s words serve as a reminder of the stakes involved and how the leadership of key institutions could shape the political climate in years to come.
